Skip to content

QA & Test Automation

Automated test suites, manual exploratory testing, device-lab coverage and release verification. Not tests for the sake of a coverage number, but the specific tests that stop the specific failures that would cost you most.

Coverage is a poor target

Chasing a coverage percentage produces suites full of tests that assert a getter returns what it was assigned. We aim instead at the paths where a failure is expensive: checkout, authentication, data loss, anything touching payments.

Automation and humans do different jobs

Automated tests verify that what worked yesterday still works. They are very bad at noticing that a flow is confusing, that an error message is unhelpful, or that a layout collapses at an unusual window size. Both kinds of testing are necessary and neither substitutes for the other.

Fast, or it will be ignored

A suite that takes forty minutes gets skipped under deadline pressure, which means it protects nothing. We keep the pre-merge suite quick and push the slow, comprehensive runs to a schedule.

Start a project

Tell us what you are trying to build

Send a short description of the problem. We will reply within two working days with questions and an honest view of the approach - not a pitch deck.